Updated: July 3, 2020

Easton Ghost X vs DeMarini CF Zen | 11 Year Old Case Study

So you’re trying to decide between a Ferrari and a Lamborghini? That’s a difficult decision. The Easton Ghost X and the DeMarini CF Zen are the top of the line bats and their price tags reflect it. Of course, when we are spending that kind of money on a bat we want to make sure we are getting what we pay for. In our Easton Ghost X vs DeMarini CF Zen article we break down our experience and some keys to helping you make a decision.

Easton Ghost X

Ghost X vs CF Zen

See our full 2018 Easton Ghost X Review

The Ghost X is the next up in Easton’s stellar line up of bats, following last year’s widely successful Mako Beast. This is, like the CF Zen, a two piece composite bat. Easton claims it uses a unique process in the connective piece to help dampen sting. In terms of what it has OVER the CF Zen:

  • Bigger Barrel Profile
  • More Sizing Options

The major advantage, as we see it, for the Easton Ghost X is the available size options. In USA Bats, for example, Easton has several more sizes than the Zen which only comes (for 2018 at least) in a drop 10. Of course both lines have a BBCOR version, but the Ghost X has more drops than the CF Zen in the 2018 USSSA too.

Price Check the Ghost X

DeMarini CF Zen 2018

Ghost X vs CF Zen

See our full 2018 DeMarini CF Zen Review

The CF Zen is a continuation of DeMarini’s popular CF series that are known to be some of the hottest bats on the market. Like the Easton Ghost X, the CF Zen is a balanced two piece composite bat. As we see it, the major advantages the CF Zen has over the Ghost X are:

  • Better feel on mishits
  • A perception of a better performance among many hitters

Although both of the above ‘advantages’ found in the CF Zen are subjective (that is, they can’t be measured perfectly) we feel confident the first one, better feel on mishits, gives it generally higher ratings especially in the USA and USSSA space.

Price Check the CF Zen

CF Zen vs Ghost X Case Study

Editor’s Note: The following head to head competition of one of our JBR writers’ players compares a 31 inch Easton Ghost X USSSA to a 30 Inch CF Zen in the USSSA market. Clearly, comparing exit speed metrics with a different sized bat does not make much empirical sense. But, in terms of overall feel, the insight of a real coaching dad and his real playing son can be useful for your decision, too. Reading more into the data than is actually there is a mistake. If you want more objective measurements you may appropriate our exit speed testswrite up as well as our barrel size comparison too.

Bat 1: Ghost X USSSA 31/21

CF Zen Vs Easton Ghost X

The Ghost X we tested is a USSSA version, 31 inches long and 21 ounces with a 2 3/4″ barrel. At the time of testing it has about 300 swings, mostly from an above average sized 11 year old, mostly tee work with some front toss and batting practice. The bat shows no sign of spiraling or webbing.

Bat 2: CF Zen USSSA 30/20

CF Zen Vs Easton Ghost X

The CF Zen we tested is a USSSA version, 30 inches long and 20 ounces with a 2 3/4″ barrel in the balanced version. The Zen has about 500 swings at the time of testing with a mix of tee work, front toss, and batting practice. Though the bat shows signs of use there is still no sign of webbing or spiraling.

Measurement Tools Head to Head

Baseball Swing Analysis

Blast Motion is a device you put on the end of a bat’s knob to measure different metrics of a bat’s swing shortly before, during and shortly after contact.

For our bat testing we used a combination of a Blast Motion bat sensor and Blast Vision app. We hit off a tee, switching bats after around 50 swings. Even though the bats are different lengths and weights and will skew the numbers slightly, we think it’s more like comparing Granny Smith apples to Red Delicious apples than apples to oranges. We also used our own experience and feedback for the testing.

Using the Blast Motion bat sensor and the new Blast Vision app we were able to gather evidence on the performance of both the DeMarini CF Zen and the Easton Ghost X.

See our Blast Motion Review.

DeMarini CF Zen Testing

CF Zen Vs Easton Ghost X

Using the Blast Motion for the CF Zen our 11 year old hitter had an average bat speed (measurement of the total speed at the sweet spot of the bat at impact) of 46.6 mph with a high of 52.7 mph. His peak hand speed (peak speed of hands moving through the zone) was an average of 16.8 mph with a max of 21.3 mph. Time to contact (start of forward motion to impact) was an average of .19 seconds with a low of .15 seconds. His power generated (measured in kilowatts) was an average of 1.0 kw and a high of 1.6 kw. His blast factor (swing score up to 100 for overall performance) was an average score of 48 and a high score of 62.

Using Blast Vision to measure exit velocity, launch angle, and distance we were able to gather even more information. Using this tool we gathered that the average exit velocity with the Zen was 70 mph with a high of 83 mph. The average distance the ball was hit was 123 feet with a high of 215 feet.

Ghost X Testing

CF Zen Vs Easton Ghost X

Using Blast Vision with Ghost X and the same hitter we collected information on performance. Our 11 year old hitter had an average bat speed of 47.3 mph with a high of 53 mph. His peak hand speed was an average of 16.9 mph with a high of 18.6 mph. Time to contact with the Ghost X was an average of .19 seconds with a low of .17 seconds. The power generated was an average of 1.08 kw and a max of 1.36 kw. His blast factor with the Ghost X was an average of 53 and a high of 65.

Using Blast Vision his average exit velocity was 66 mph with a max of 73 mph. The average distance the ball was hit was 127 feet with a high of 210 feet.

Case Study Results

So, what does all this tell us? That both bats are very good! Our 11 year old hitter was able to generate slightly more power according to the Blast Motion with the Ghost X. We believe those results are most likely the result of the difference between the two bats’ lengths and weights. As he was able to swing both at roughly the same speed with similar hand speed and time to contact, the difference in kilowatt power and blast factor is likely a direct result of more weight behind the swing.

The exit velocity showed a distinct difference between the Zen and the Ghost though with the ball coming off the bat an average of 4 mph faster from the Zen and a top speed 10 mph faster This could arguably be the difference between the number of swings the bats have had at the time of testing.

Case Study Choice

CF Zen Vs Easton Ghost X

We did notice that the CF Zen had less hand sting on miss hits than the Ghost X, but the Ghost was still pretty forgiving. The barrel on the Ghost X is sightly bigger, offering a little more sweet spot. The CF Zen seemed to be hotter out of the wrapper and the Ghost needed more break in time, not unusual for Easton bats. It’s difficult to say right now, but in the past our experience has shown Easton bats have been more durable than DeMarini. The price point on both of the bats are identical with a $350 price tag from the manufacturers.

Our 11 year old hitter likes both bats quite a bit, but when pushed he has a small preference for the Ghost X. He believes it has a better feel for him and he hits it better when swinging correctly. You will have to decide for yourself what aspects you’re looking for most – faster break in time, more durability, or bigger sweet spot. Which ever decision you make, we are sure you’ll be happy with the performance of the bat.